|
The purpose of the scientific review process is to
support the human research review process, including IRB review, by
ensuring that human research conducted at BIDMC meets the highest level
of scientific merit and design. To accomplish this goal, scientific
reviewers representing the many clinical disciplines and the diverse
human subject research portfolio at BIDMC are appointed to perform a
scientific review of human research studies.
Scientific review is required of all research proposals prior to CCI
submission.
The Scientific Review Officer for the PI’s department is required to
review the entire Protocol and complete the Scientific Review Officer
Form. Proposals will not be accepted without the signed SRO Form.
In their review, Scientific Reviewer Officers (SRO) specifically
evaluate whether or not the following criteria have been met:
- There is adequate merit to justify using human research subjects;
Confirm that there is no other method to investigate this question that
would not require the use of human subjects;
The risk/benefit ratio is favorable;
Risks to subjects have been minimized by employing sound scientific
design, and to the extent possible employ procedures that subjects would
undergo as part of their regular care;
Potential risks have been accurately and fully described in the IRB
application and consent form;
The data and safety monitoring plan is adequate given the risk level of
the study;
- The study design adequate to answer the scientific question posed;
-
There is a reasonable likelihood the PI will be able to meet her/his
enrollment goal.
SROs can require investigators to revise
their submissions if they find the submission to inadequately address
the points above, before giving their approval. In some cases the SRO
may feel that additional reviewers, perhaps from other disciplines, are
required to adequately complete the scientific review of a research
study.
List of Scientific Review Officers
SRO Form
|